GCMC issues with GFortran and openMP (CASS V1.2)
- ozzie787
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 2
7 years 9 months ago #172
by ozzie787
Hello forum,
I have been running the Nitrogen GCMC example to test Cassandra 1.2 and noticed an issue with reproducing the result provided with the example when using a GFortran compiled version of the code with openMP.
While both Intel and serial GFortran versions reproduce the result, GFortran with openMP is miles off (See attached graph plot.jpg). The graph is from an Ubuntu system but this is also seen on OS X where deletion only seems to occur (See plot2.png).
Running this example with CASS V1.1 does not display this abnormality with any compiler/openMP combination.
For now, I am just highlighting what I have observed in case it is not an isolated incident.
Regards,
Stephen
OS's/Compiler(s):
Ubuntu 15.04: gfortran 4.9.2, ifort 13.0.0 20120731
OS X 10.11.5: gfortran (Homebrew gcc 6.1.0 --without-multilib)
I have been running the Nitrogen GCMC example to test Cassandra 1.2 and noticed an issue with reproducing the result provided with the example when using a GFortran compiled version of the code with openMP.
While both Intel and serial GFortran versions reproduce the result, GFortran with openMP is miles off (See attached graph plot.jpg). The graph is from an Ubuntu system but this is also seen on OS X where deletion only seems to occur (See plot2.png).
Running this example with CASS V1.1 does not display this abnormality with any compiler/openMP combination.
For now, I am just highlighting what I have observed in case it is not an isolated incident.
Regards,
Stephen
OS's/Compiler(s):
Ubuntu 15.04: gfortran 4.9.2, ifort 13.0.0 20120731
OS X 10.11.5: gfortran (Homebrew gcc 6.1.0 --without-multilib)
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- ozzie787
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 10
- Thank you received: 2
- ryangmullen
- Offline
- Administrator
Less
More
- Posts: 124
- Karma: 4
- Thank you received: 24
Time to create page: 0.102 seconds